Natural gas: 3.5-4.5 cents* Of course wind is not available on demand, and the capacity factor is only between 20% and 30% at best. Most wind occurs at other than peak demand times, making wind less than worthless. In other words, the 7-9 cents per kwh quoted for wind above is horse shit in terms of relevance.
Coal: 4-5 cents
Hydro: 4 cents
Nuclear: 8 cents
Wind: 7-9 cents*
Solar: 15-50 cents
Question: Why as a country are we investing billions of dollars in the most expensive option (solar) and ignoring the cheapest (natural gas), especially when the U.S. is the "Saudi Arabia of natural gas"? _MJPerry
Facts on the cost of generating electricity (per kilowatt hour):
Of course nuclear would be much less expensive to build and operate without government obstruction in new development, licensing, and permitting.
It is rather obvious that any improvements that occur in the energy picture, will occur in spite of Obama's policies, rather than because of them.
Do you feel that solar will eventually become competitive price wise per kilowatt hour with natural gas etc?
ReplyDeleteIt depends upon what the government does to make natural gas prohibitively expensive. The government can make anything competitive by making everything else far more expensive than it should be.
ReplyDeleteSolar PV could be 100% efficient, and be given away to customers for free, and it would still not be suitable for utility-scale power generation. Unless -- you put the solar panels in orbit to catch the sunlight virtually all the time.
But putting heavy things in orbit is very expensive in itself.
There is far too much wishful thinking going on among the general public with regard to big wind and big solar. A lot of money has been wasted already, and much more will be wasted over the next several years.